Evidence

Current Evidence - Validation against Transoesophagel Doppler

Index

01Non-invasive Cardiac Output: accuracy between the Uscom and the Esophageal Doppler monitor
02Differences between Cardio-Q and USCOM Doppler cardiac output readings in high risk surgery patients
03Cardiac output changes during robotic laparoscopic surgery
04Stroke volume optimisation in elective abdominal surgery: a comparison between a non-invasive Doppler device (USCOM) and the oesophageal Doppler (CardioQ)
05An assessment of two Doppler-based monitors to track cardiac output changes in anaesthetised patients undergoing major surgery
06Five algorithms that calculate cardiac output from the arterial waveform: a comparison with Doppler ultrasound
07Does using two Doppler cardiac output monitors in tandem provide a reliable trend line of changes for validation studies?
08A comparison of the non-invasive ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) with the oesophageal Doppler monitor during major abdominal surgery
-Summary by category

Non-invasive Cardiac Output: accuracy between the Uscom and the Esophageal Doppler monitor

Martini, John 1, Bilkovski, Robert 1, Crawford, John 2.
1Emergency Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
2Respiratory Therapy, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA

Presented: 36th Annual Congress of the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) Orlando, Florida, February 17-21, 2007; 27th ISICEM, March 27-30, Brussels

Published: Critical Care March 2007, Vol 11 Supp 2, 27th International Symposium of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine - P288

UpBack to index

Differences between Cardio-Q and USCOM Doppler cardiac output readings in high risk surgery patients

Lester Critchley

Presented: World Congress of Anaesthesiologists

Published: British Journal of Anaesthesia 108 (S2): ii109 - ii144 (2012) doi:10.1093/bja/aer479

UpBack to index

Cardiac output changes during robotic laparoscopic surgery

Lester Critchley, Li Huang

Presented: 32nd Congress of the Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine

Published: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 57 (Suppl. 120), 4-37

UpBack to index

Stroke volume optimisation in elective abdominal surgery: a comparison between a non-invasive Doppler device (USCOM) and the oesophageal Doppler (CardioQ)

Hodgson L., Samuels T., Jenkins C., Wakeling H.

Presented: ESA

Published: European Journal of Anaesthesiology Volume 31 | e-Supplement 52 | June 2014 (3 AP5-1)

UpBack to index

An assessment of two Doppler-based monitors to track cardiac output changes in anaesthetised patients undergoing major surgery

Huang L, Critchley L

Published: Anaesth Intensive Care. 2014 Sep;42(5):631-9

UpBack to index

Five algorithms that calculate cardiac output from the arterial waveform: a comparison with Doppler ultrasound

J. Zhang, L. A. H. Critchley, and L. Huang

Published: Br. J. Anaesth. (2015) doi: 10.1093/bja/aev254

UpBack to index

Does using two Doppler cardiac output monitors in tandem provide a reliable trend line of changes for validation studies?

Li H, Critchley LA, Zhang J

Published: J Clin Monit Comput. 2015 Aug 28

UpBack to index

A comparison of the non-invasive ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) with the oesophageal Doppler monitor during major abdominal surgery

Luke E Hodgson, Lui G Forni, Richard Venn, Theophilus L Samuels and Howard G Wakeling

Published: Journal of the Intensive Care Society May 2016 vol. 17 no. 2 103-110, DOI:10.1177/1751143715619186

UpBack to index